A couple may enter into a concubibining agreement with the intention of addressing things that might happen during the time they live together, but concubibining agreements are most often supposed to address the problems that might arise if their relationship falls apart. The most common reason why a couple opposes a concubine`s contract is the protection of their separate property and income, so that the property of anyone who enters into a relationship is preserved to the extent possible when the relationship ends. Sometimes one person wants to protect property from the other`s claims; Sometimes one person will want to protect the property from the other`s debt. In general, most couples who are considering entering into a concubine agreement want some sort of “I keep what belongs to me, you keep what belongs to you,” and that`s okay. You can write about these things in the agreement, but the court will not impose them if you separate. The only exception is when you make your deal because you have decided to separate, but still live together in a house. There must be fairness in the way the agreement is negotiated, in the way it is designed and in the way it is signed. A term under the Family Act that describes the right of access of a person who is not a guardian with a child. Contact may be made by court order or by agreement between the child`s legal guardians with parental responsibility to rule on the contact. See “Guardians” and “parental responsibility”. There is a growing trend of people trying to save money by using online resources to create their own concubine agreements. You can still make a deal after your separation. This is called a separation agreement.
It`s a little more complicated than making a concubine deal, but there are people who can help you. See the meeting of an agreement after separation and who can help you reach an agreement? to learn more. In the first part of these Series B concubine agreements.C. we looked at two of the most common reasons why concubbinate agreements can be overturned by B.C courts – due to lack of independent legal advice and insufficient financial disclosure. . . .