8 In most cases, the reproduced form may indicate the plurality of the participants, but the corresponding strain does not involve a number of singular participants without repeating it. However, a handful of verbs strictly associate the presence or absence of repeating with the plural vs singular participant, compare: (This last sentence is passive; it might be better to construct the sentence more actively by identifying – and stressing – those who have raised objections: “Community members have raised a number of objections during the period of public comment.” Occasionally, however, the identity of the actor or actor is irrelevant, or the author wishes to highlight or conceal their identity. This is why passive construction is not categorically false – it is just less direct.) The agreement is one of those basic areas of English grammar with which many advanced learners, such as commas and capital letters, still regularly make mistakes. Part of the reason is probably that the concept of agreement actually covers a fairly wide range of different structures. As a result, different aspects are usually presented at different times, making it more difficult for learners to make useful connections between them, and there are many places where errors are likely. The same principle applies when the sentence begins with explivity here or here, followed by a verb: “There are a number of objections” and “Here are the number of chairs you have requested.” Even these sentences are not necessarily ideally constructed, but if you have to write in such a syntactic style, remember: “A number . . . ” and “The number .
. . . east. Without the dominant mastery of the subject-verbal chord upon reading, there may be a failure to recognize which of the different names is a subject in a sentence. This point is made by the following sentence of the 28th Pronoun-Error: If the sentence begins however with “The number”, the following verb should be singular: “The number of chairs available is 500”, for example, is true because the subject of the sentence is number, not chairs, and the number is a singular noun. (Of course, “Five hundred chairs are available” – avoid starting a sentence with a single number – more direct and concise, but sometimes a more relaxed syntax is desirable.) “The agreement of numbers.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/number%20Conscitative. Access 27 Nov 2020. 7So adjective and reduplication acts as a chord of numbers.
At least for verbs, such an agreement seems to be semantic; the NP, whose plurality is signalled by the redoubling, can have no other indication of plurality: this combination of agreements includes only the possessives of me, our, sound, sound, sound, your, your, theirs and some. They always face a nostun, but not what they agree: I would come across so many people who make mistakes in the use of “numbers”. Thank you for eliminating this point of confusion. Nominal Convention: Number and Gender Orientation 20The position of owner in Beng should not be occupied indecently, even for relational semantic subtanties such as notions of kinship and body parts for which the owner can be deducted. This option is the only characteristic that distinguishes the owner position from the other positions in the second line of Table 7, such as the direct object position. B: number and determination of the NP, which must be doubled by a pronoun. Undetermined NPs Singuliers are generally not doubled by pronouns. The doubling of some singular NPNs is optional, and the doubling of plural NPs is almost always mandatory: the difference may seem negligible, but in a construction “number”, although the multiplicity of phenomena is important, the identity of the phenomena – objections, in the first example – is the essential information above.